Chemotherapeutic metabolism presenting as a recalcitrant case of hand-foot syndrome and mucositis.

INTRODUCTION: Mercaptopurine (6MP) and methotrexate (MTX) are commonly used for maintenance chemotherapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). These medications have been associated with various side effects such as myelosuppression, colitis, and thyroiditis in addition to numerous cutaneous adverse events. Cutaneous side-effects most reported include mucositis, alopecia, xerosis, and pruritus. We report an interesting case of hand-foot syndrome to 6MP in a child on maintenance therapy for B-cell ALL from an alteration in medication metabolism. CASE: We report a 10-year-old male on maintenance chemotherapy for pre-Bcell ALL who presented to the hospital with worsening oral lesions and erythematous, fissured plaques on the palms and soles. Maintenance therapy consisted of IV vincristine and 5-day pulse of steroids every 12 weeks, daily 6MP, and weekly MTX, which were increased to ≥ 150% of standard dosing due to persistent absolute neutrophil counts > 1500. Metabolites obtained on admission demonstrated elevated 6MMP metabolites at 35,761 (normal < 5700). TPMT and NUDT15 enzyme activity were normal and no alterations in genotyping were discovered. OUTCOME: Patient's oral chemotherapy, including both 6MP and MTX, were stopped and allopurinol 100 mg daily was initiated, which lead to overall improvement. DISCUSSION: Clinical findings of acute mucositis and worsening of hand-foot syndrome, in the setting of inadequate myelosuppression in a child on maintenance therapy for ALL should raise concerns to consider altered metabolism pathway leading to toxic metabolite buildup. Allopurinol can play in improving cutaneous manifestation and chemotherapeutic dosing in patients with altered metabolism.

Keloid treatments: an evidence-based systematic review of recent advances.

BACKGROUND: Keloids are pathologic scars that pose a significant functional and cosmetic burden. They are challenging to treat, despite the multitude of treatment modalities currently available. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to conduct an evidence-based review of all prospective data regarding keloid treatments published between 2010 and 2020. METHODS: A systematic literature search of PubMed (National Library of Medicine), Embase (Elsevier), and Cochrane Library (Wiley) was performed in November of 2020. Search strategies with the keywords "keloid" and "treatment" were performed by a medical librarian. The search was limited to prospective studies that were peer-reviewed, reported on clinical outcomes of keloid therapies, and were published in the English language between January 1, 2010, and November 24, 2020. RESULTS: A total of 3462 unique citations were identified, of which 108 studies met inclusion criteria. Current literature supports silicone gel or sheeting with corticosteroid injections as first-line therapy for keloids. Adjuvant intralesional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), bleomycin, or verapamil can be considered, although mixed results have been reported with each. Laser therapy can be used in combination with intralesional corticosteroids or topical steroids with occlusion to improve drug penetration. Excision of keloids with immediate post-excision radiation therapy is an effective option for recalcitrant lesions. Finally, silicone sheeting and pressure therapy have evidence for reducing keloid recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: This review was limited by heterogeneity of subject characteristics and study outcome measures, small sample sizes, and inconsistent study designs. Larger and more robust controlled studies are necessary to further understand the variety of existing and emerging keloid treatments, including corticosteroids, cryotherapy, intralesional injections, lasers, photodynamic therapy, excision and radiation, pressure dressings, and others.

Skin tightening.

There are many undesirable manifestations that arise as one ages. One of the most notable undesired effects is increasing skin laxity. Traditionally, the gold standard of treatment is surgical correction of skin laxity. However, demand for noninvasive aesthetic procedures has grown due to minimal risk and accelerated recovery time. Over the years, many new devices have become available for addressing skin laxity including laser therapy, radiofrequency (RF), ultrasound, and intense pulsed light (IPL). This article discusses these various noninvasive treatment options and seeks to give providers details of the science behind each device.